sortifal/CIA
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
CIA/e-voting-system/.claude/commands/openspec/proposal.md
Alexis Bruneteau 67a2b3ec6f fix: Restore backend infrastructure and complete Phase 2 & 3 
Restores all missing project files and fixes:
- Restored backend/blockchain.py with full blockchain implementation
- Restored backend/routes/votes.py with all API endpoints
- Restored frontend/components/voting-interface.tsx voting UI
- Fixed backend/crypto/hashing.py to handle both str and bytes
- Fixed pyproject.toml for Poetry compatibility
- All cryptographic modules tested and working
- ElGamal encryption, ZK proofs, digital signatures functional
- Blockchain integrity verification working
- Homomorphic vote counting implemented and tested

Phase 2 Backend API: ✓ COMPLETE
Phase 3 Frontend Interface: ✓ COMPLETE

Verification:
✓ Frontend builds successfully (12 routes)
✓ Backend crypto modules all import correctly
✓ Full voting simulation works end-to-end
✓ Blockchain records and verifies votes
✓ Homomorphic vote counting functional

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-07 01:56:10 +01:00

2.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

name: OpenSpec: Proposal description: Scaffold a new OpenSpec change and validate strictly. category: OpenSpec tags: [openspec, change]

Guardrails

  • Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required.
  • Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome.
  • Refer to openspec/AGENTS.md (located inside the openspec/ directory—run ls openspec or openspec update if you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications.
  • Identify any vague or ambiguous details and ask the necessary follow-up questions before editing files.

Steps

  1. Review openspec/project.md, run openspec list and openspec list --specs, and inspect related code or docs (e.g., via rg/ls) to ground the proposal in current behaviour; note any gaps that require clarification.
  2. Choose a unique verb-led change-id and scaffold proposal.md, tasks.md, and design.md (when needed) under openspec/changes/<id>/.
  3. Map the change into concrete capabilities or requirements, breaking multi-scope efforts into distinct spec deltas with clear relationships and sequencing.
  4. Capture architectural reasoning in design.md when the solution spans multiple systems, introduces new patterns, or demands trade-off discussion before committing to specs.
  5. Draft spec deltas in changes/<id>/specs/<capability>/spec.md (one folder per capability) using ## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED Requirements with at least one #### Scenario: per requirement and cross-reference related capabilities when relevant.
  6. Draft tasks.md as an ordered list of small, verifiable work items that deliver user-visible progress, include validation (tests, tooling), and highlight dependencies or parallelizable work.
  7. Validate with openspec validate <id> --strict and resolve every issue before sharing the proposal.

Reference

  • Use openspec show <id> --json --deltas-only or openspec show <spec> --type spec to inspect details when validation fails.
  • Search existing requirements with rg -n "Requirement:|Scenario:" openspec/specs before writing new ones.
  • Explore the codebase with rg <keyword>, ls, or direct file reads so proposals align with current implementation realities.